Legal Shock in St. Paul (55101): Mike Lindell’s Lawyers Sanctioned for Using Fake AI Citations – LIVE UPDATES

Downtown St. Paul, MN (55101) – A federal judge in St. Paul, Minnesota, has sanctioned attorneys representing MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell after they submitted a legal filing that included fake, AI-generated case citations. The court determined that at least six non-existent cases were used in a motion, raising serious concerns about legal ethics and the unchecked use of generative AI in the courtroom. Judge Eric Tostrud called the behavior “unprofessional” and imposed monetary sanctions. The filing, reportedly generated using AI tools like ChatGPT, has sparked national attention, making it one of the first known federal cases involving court sanctions over artificial intelligence misuse in legal practice.

Key Facts

• BREAKING: Federal judge sanctions attorneys for filing fake AI-generated legal citations

• IMPACT: At least six non-existent cases submitted; Lindell’s legal team fined and reprimanded

• OFFICIAL SOURCE: “This conduct fell well below the standard of practice,” – Judge Eric Tostrud

• ACTION: Lawyers advised to verify AI output before filing legal briefs in court

Hyperlocal Impact

1. 📌 Precise Location:
   Downtown St. Paul, MN (55101) — U.S. District Court near Kellogg Blvd and Jackson Street

2. 👥 Community Connection:
   “It’s a wake-up call—AI tools must be double-checked. This is basic lawyering.”
   – Megan Sloane, legal assistant at local St. Paul firm

3. 📷 Visual Proof:
   

Exclusive Angle

WHY THIS MATTERS NOW:

This case marks Minnesota’s first federal court sanction related to AI misuse, igniting a growing national debate about generative AI’s place in the legal field and whether ethical safeguards are strong enough.

DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE:

Crisis Response

Immediate Resources

» MN Board of Legal Ethics: www.lprb.mncourts.gov
» ABA Ethics on AI Usage: www.americanbar.org/ai-guidelines
» Legal Research Tools: Westlaw | Casetext | Fastcase

Official Guidance

“Artificial intelligence doesn’t relieve lawyers of their professional responsibility to ensure accuracy.”
– Judge Eric Tostrud, U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota

Community Pulse

VOTE: Should all legal filings involving AI require a certification of human review?
👍 Yes 👎 No
Share your thoughts – legal educators and lawmakers are tracking responses.

Update Log

• 🆕 3:45 PM: Judge imposes monetary sanctions on attorneys in Lindell’s election-related lawsuit

• 🆕 2:30 PM: Filing confirmed to include six fabricated case citations created by AI

• 🆕 11:15 AM: Lawyers acknowledge using generative AI to draft portions of legal brief