The conflict between Governor DeSantis and Disney World spills beyond court, affecting the local level in Central Florida’s Tourism Oversight District.
The repercussions of alterations made to Disney World’s special district have now hit home for district employees, triggering a wave of unexpected financial burdens and a shift in employment perks.
A recent revelation surfaced in an internal memo obtained by the Orlando Sentinel, penned by district administrator Glen Gilzean.
Employees were abruptly informed of the revocation of their Disney World annual passes, a once-coveted job benefit, due to their classification as a taxable asset.
Gilzean admitted that past leadership had neglected to disclose this tax implication, leaving employees facing a staggering $2 million in back taxes linked to these previously provided
passes.
Although certain employee benefits remain non-taxable, the district contends that these passes do not fall within that category.
The resolution of this tax conundrum, however, seems to be in flux. Gilzean expressed intentions to negotiate with the IRS to alleviate the burden on employees, seeking an alternative that doesn’t necessitate direct payment of outstanding taxes from their pockets.
DeSantis’s Influence on District Dissatisfaction
Notably, the fallout from this decision puts Disney in a unique position. As the primary revenue source for the district, any expenses the district incurs, including tax liabilities, eventually circle back to Disney.
This situation suggests that Disney could potentially be responsible for covering expenses related to both the continuing legal conflict and the tax issues impacting its staff members, ultimately bearing the financial burden for these matters.
However, the district has opted to discontinue the annual pass perk altogether, signaling a paradigm shift in employee benefits.
Instead, employees are offered a $1000 stipend that can be utilized for any purpose, including purchasing annual passes, albeit inadequate for families compared to the previous inclusive benefit.
The public disclosure of these changes appears calculated, likely an attempt by the board to rally support among employees amidst reported low morale.
Recent resignations following Governor DeSantis’s reshaping of the board have underscored dissatisfaction within the district. This reshuffle is perceived as a facet of DeSantis’s contentious relationship with Disney World, contributing to a turbulent work environment within the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District.
or a specific category with our 
Comments are closed.