Senate Bill 149, which was introduced on Tuesday, February 13, may soon provide Alaskans with better access to SNAP benefits.
The proposed legislation seeks to bring about several key changes to SNAP eligibility requirements in the state, with the primary focus on raising the household income requirement.
Under the bill, the household income requirement for SNAP eligibility in Alaska would be increased from 130 percent of the federal poverty line to 200 percent. This change is part of the broad-based categorical eligibility (BBCE) policy, a federal initiative aimed at preventing the benefits cliff phenomenon.
Senate Majority Leader Cathy Giessel, the sponsor of the bill, highlighted in her letter that this shift would allow families to avoid choosing between accepting a pay increase and feeding their families, ultimately promoting financial stability and self-sufficiency.
Giessel’s proposed changes also include the introduction of a new online application system and the elimination of the SNAP asset test. According to Giessel, these adjustments will streamline the application process and reduce staff time spent on processing applications, particularly during periods of high demand.
Food Bank of Alaska Applauds SNAP Reform
The bill has gained support from the Food Bank of Alaska, emphasizing the potential positive impact on working families.
Ron Meehand, the director of government affairs at the non-profit group, stated that the current SNAP structure can disincentivize work, and the proposed changes would encourage families to save, exit the program, and accept raises without fear of losing benefits.
Giessel sees the bill as a transformative step towards building a more reliant and prosperous future for Alaska and its residents.
The sponsor letter indicates that one in eight Alaskans could benefit from the proposed changes, addressing the limitations of the current system and aligning with modernization efforts.
The main objective of Alaska’s SNAP reform efforts is to encourage self-sufficiency and financial stability for those in need, which could have a substantial impact on working families and seniors.
Comments are closed.